Two Product Lines With Different Quantities
A Namibia-addressed trade invoice lists four units of injector reference 0445110369 and sixteen units under reference 4326780.
Both lines are described as injectors in the supplied record.
Although the combined requirement is 20 units, the two lines differ in size and should remain separate in the purchasing record.
Keep the Two Counts Visible
| Injector reference | Quantity |
| 0445110369 | 4 PCS |
| 4326780 | 16 PCS |
| Total | 20 PCS |
The 4326780 line accounts for most of the required quantity, while 0445110369 remains a separate four-unit requirement.
A combined figure of 20 pieces is not enough on its own because it could hide a shortage or an incorrect quantity on either line.
What the Source Does Not Establish
The invoice does not provide engine-fitment information, performance results or proof that the two references belong to the same equipment.
Their presence together demonstrates a shared purchasing record only.
It does not prove that the injectors can replace one another or that they were intended for one repair job.
Namibia Market and Commercial Terms
The Namibia market is supported by the buyer address on the invoice.
Courier and payment terms appear on the document, but final receipt and service results are not shown.
The available source should therefore be used to describe the purchasing requirement rather than a completed engine repair or proven product-performance outcome.
Case Summary
This Namibia case records a two-line injector requirement with a four-to-sixteen quantity split.
Its distinguishing feature is the need to retain the correct count for each reference instead of relying on the combined 20-unit total.
